Author: John Osae-Kwapong (PhD.)
The late Prof. Kwame Gyekye once said this about democracy: “I think it means, equally importantly, that democracy is a government whose form of practice derives in its entirety from the historical and cultural experiences of a people and is in conformity with their vision of how they want to be governed or govern themselves; a system of government born of the hopes and aspirations of a people and in the shaping of which the people have a real say and commitment to; a political structure to which the people, in consequence, have intellectual, ideological, and emotional attachments; a system of government that is considered by the people as their own and which they are ever prepared to protect and defend to the hilt.”
Notice the number of references to “people” in Prof. Gyekye’s definition of democracy. It drives home the point that democracies do not sustain themselves but require active and engaged citizens. Civic habits such as voting, showing interest in the affairs of the state, discussing politics, etc. help sustain democracies.
A vibrant civic culture enables citizens to stay informed as well as find ways to communicate with their elected and non-elected public officers. It also enables public officeholders to be responsive to the needs of citizens and ensures accountability.
Ghanaians exhibit positive civic habits as captured through the Afrobarometer survey. When asked over nine rounds of the survey whether they voted in the most recent election, about seven out of ten (69%) Ghanaians indicated that they do participate in the electoral process. Regarding their interest in public affairs, overall, about six out of ten (64%) described themselves as being somewhat/ very interested in public affairs although at the last iteration of this question in 2014, there was a significant (14 percentage points) decline. Lastly, when asked how often they discuss politics, over nine rounds of the survey, seven out of ten (66%) citizens said that they occasionally or often discuss politics.
Despite these positive approaches, Ghanaians do not participate in collective action activities. The percentage of those who say they have joined others to raise an issue at least once has declined from fifty-three percent (53%) in 1999 to thirty-three percent (33%) in 2022. The percentage who say they have attended a demonstration at least once has also declined from an already low of nine percent (9%) to five percent (5%) in 2022.
Contacting public officials is another weak spot in the civic engagement habits of Ghanaians. How often do Ghanaians say they contact their member of parliament? Over nine rounds of the survey, overall, one out of ten (14%) say they do. That percentage has not changed much, ranging between thirteen and sixteen percent (13%-16%) throughout nine rounds of the survey.
On the 30th anniversary of constitutional democracy in Ghana, the Chairperson of the National Commission for Civic Education had this to say concerning the citizens’ approach to effective democracy: “An indolent, disengaged citizenry cannot sustain a democracy. It is only in dictatorships that citizens are expected and indeed even encouraged to be passive. To maintain a successful democracy, all citizens must be fully engaged at all times.”
Although I agree in principle that democratic sustenance requires active and engaged citizens and that our constitution has made several provisions that allow citizens to engage and be active; it occurs to me upon further reflection, that there is a dimension to the call to be ‘active and engaged citizens’ that is rarely discussed – the cost or the price that has to be paid for citizens who choose to be active and engaged. It is therefore not enough for The State to call on citizens to be active.
It is also not sufficient for The State to say that the constitution has offered everything needed to be an active citizen. The State must demonstrate through word and especially deeds that active and engaged citizenship is needed and appreciated. Indeed, the actions and inactions of The State and its agents must reduce the cost or the price to pay for active and engaged citizenship.
A good friend once asked me, “Are you saying that people feel victimized when they speak up?” to which I responded, “The State, its agents, its supporters should not make speaking up costly, through things like victimization, when citizens become active and engaged. I think we have seen several examples over the course of the 4th Republic, the high cost of active and engaged citizenship but we really do not talk about that aspect whenever we urge citizens to engage and be active.”
While we urge citizens to be active and engaged in a responsible manner, we must equally urge The State to reduce the cost and burden of active and engaged citizenship.
John Osae-Kwapong (PhD.) is a Democracy and Development (D&D) Fellow at CDD-Ghana, Associate Provost for Assessment, Accreditation, and Institutional Effectiveness, Baruch College, The City University of New York.
