The RARE 5 INFAMOUS JSCs whose ruling is feeding into the conspiracy of selling their hard earned profession for Nana Addo is quite worrying at this critical period to 2024 elections.
Let’s keep the matter simple. Supreme Court has the jurisdiction to interpret Article 97(g&h). Other than that, the high court per article 99(1a) has the jurisdiction and NOT THE SC.
I am not a lawyer but applying a common sense. So, what is the relevance of the ex-parte motion to the SC by Afenyo Markin and for what purpose and if not to prove the conspiracy to the whole nation that indeed the CJ and most of the JSCs are perceived Nana Addo’s stooges? I don’t get it. Do you?
I don’t know what is wrong with this CJ. She is not strategically minded at all in her handling of justice matters, in my opinion. She is being perceived as a plain stooge to Nana Addo. Why should she even be part of this panel 5 JSCs?
Even if she is under pressure, allow other members of JSCs to do this perceived unwarranted business for Nana Addo. But she is coming out as unconscious incompetent and greed to please her benefactor have brought the entire SC to disrepute endangering the national security by her lack of good judgement and opening the Pandora box of distrust against the SC. This is a real danger to our democracy and our lives.
We hope the Speaker, Bagbin being a lawyer himself will help to remedy the situation by going back to the SC to set aside their controversial direction with glaring errors and even crying more than the bereaved Afenyo Markin NPP.
Parliament should avoid institutional power showdown, which might deepen the danger ahead of the 2024 election.
This is what happens when greedy galamsey, as supervised by Nana Addo- Bawumia’s government, is destroying nature and no wonder that now nature is annoyed to destroy Ghanaians if we don’t remove this Nana-Bawumia government.
When you see people jumping for NPP, then you will know that MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY IS OXYMORONIC AND IT PRECLUDES ALL FORMS OF PATRIOTIC GUMPTION.
When Ghanaians were angry to remove Mahama in 2016, we felt we were growing, and we needed to show this consistency in 2024 elections.
Albeit the reality of the chaos is rather what the 5 JSCs have done. Parliament is not a court room where we use evidence and all the legal technicalities to argue.
Parliament operates based on its usual application of the 1992 constitution, its Standing Orders, rules, and procedures, which are quite different from how the courts go about in arriving at their verdicts.
The JSC should not interfere with Parliament’s internal procedures that the Speaker used. As Speaker Mike Oquaye declared, if these 4 MPs are not removed, which side will they be representing when they win 7th December until 6 January?
The entrenched Article 55(2) of 1992 constitution states; “Every citizen of Ghana of voting age has the right to join A POLITICAL PARTY.” So at no single point should a person be allowed to join 2 or more political entities at the same time. So, what are the 5 JSCs trying to achieve for Ghana. Are they above the 1992 Constitution?
The speed by the SC is excellent, and they could have used this ruling to RESPECT THE SPEAKER’S DECLARATION while to have also summoned the speaker on Monday and set the necessary ruling as they hurriedly did on Friday. Assuming without admitting that the speaker is wrong.
Rather, Tuesday, October 22, 2024, may be chaos if Parliament decides to stomp on its powers, and that will amount to a showdown of the two independent arms of government.
Whilst the executive arm may be jumping to declare a state of emergency that may go beyond December 7, 2024.
Besides, SALL has NOT been with representation for 4 years by these same JSCs. LGBTQ has been denied by the SC despite 99% Ghanaians wanting justice.
My greatest worry is the element of distrust.
This saga is going to feed into the chaos of the national security threat posed by 2024 elections within 2 months.
Any decision that anyone takes, which poses a threat to my life, I will speak against it, and these 5 infamous JSCs are no different. If it had been any of the lower courts, there’s still hope.
If the panel had been without the CJ, there’s still hope, and that’s the crass of lack of good judgement by the CJ and her 5 Infamous JSCs. May God have mercy on Ghana.
The only remedy is the right application, interpretation, and respect of 1992 constitution, where justice shall be seen to have been done to this misunderstanding of minority takeover of parliament by NPPs own internal party’s machinations.
