Zeepay has issued a public statement clarifying its position on recent media reports surrounding an ongoing legal matter involving the company and other parties, emphasizing that the case remains before the Court of Appeal and has not yet reached a final determination.
The fintech company said some of the reports currently circulating in the media do not accurately reflect the status of the case and could mislead the public regarding the legal proceedings.
According to Zeepay, the matter is still under judicial consideration, making it inappropriate for the company to engage in public commentary beyond acknowledging the ongoing court process.
Management explained that any inaccurate or misleading publications concerning the case would be addressed through the appropriate legal channels rather than through public exchanges or media debates.
“The matter remains before the courts, pending determination by the Court of Appeal,” the company stated, stressing that the judicial process should be allowed to proceed without interference or speculation.
Zeepay reaffirmed its commitment to the rule of law, indicating that it respects the independence and integrity of Ghana’s judicial system and would continue to cooperate with the legal process until a final ruling is delivered.
The company further noted that because the matter is sub judice, it would refrain from making any additional public comments that could prejudice or undermine ongoing court proceedings.
“We will refrain from commenting further on matters that are sub judice, and we urge the public to treat unverified reports with caution pending the courts’ final determination,” the statement said.
Despite the ongoing legal proceedings, Zeepay assured its partners, customers, employees, and other stakeholders that its operations remain unaffected and that it continues to conduct its business with professionalism and integrity.
Management expressed appreciation for the confidence and support shown by its partners and customers, reaffirming the company’s commitment to maintaining high standards of corporate governance while awaiting the Court of Appeal’s decision.
